Tag Archives: Moreton Bay

“Hey Venus, Oh Venus”

Many of the younger readers may not be familiar with Franky Avalon and his 1959 hit song ‘Venus’, which contains a plea from a young man to the Roman Goddess of Love to help him find that elusive special someone (if you’re feeling nostalgic you can find him performing the song at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fakpqLDEQAo). Much like the young soul yearning to discover love, we also went in search of Venus as part of the final leg of our magnetometer trials. The small snow-brig Venus made an unscheduled stop in Moreton Bay for supplies in 1855 while transporting sugar from Manila to Melbourne. The Venus attempted to enter the Bay without a pilot and took the wrong channel, foundering off the northern end of Moreton Island on a sand bank system that was subsequently named after the wreck.

A key issue for magnetometer survey was narrowing the search area. Historical research was conducted but sources were few, given the vessel was lost when Queensland was still part of the colony of New South Wales. Newspaper reports from the time did, however, provide quite detailed information on the events leading up to the wrecking, with some vocal critics stating that a missing navigation marker played a key role. In order to help refine the search area, archaeologists Amelia Lacey and Toni Massey liaised with Mr Ian Jempson, Chief Executive Officer of the Queensland Maritime Museum and a former naval navigator. The Queensland Maritime Museum holds copies of historic admiralty charts for Moreton Bay, which were digitised and then georeferenced by Amelia. Ian was able to cross reference the historic sailing instructions with the published account of the wreck’s position and develop a theory of where it is located now. The varying positions of the banks over time were also tracked on the charts.

Image 1: A georeferenced copy of the 1846 navigation chart for Moreton Bay

Image 1: A georeferenced copy of the 1846 navigation chart for Moreton Bay

Not unexpectedly, there was a significant margin of error in the georeferenced charts and this resulted in a larger search area than hoped. To supplement the mapping team’s work I sought information about potential sightings of the wreck from public informants and marine parks staff.

Image 2: The search area (marked by the larger box with yellow contours) for the wreck of the Venus superimposed on the historic chart. Note the name Venus Banks immediately above the search area.

Image 2: The search area (marked by the larger box with yellow contours) for the wreck of the Venus superimposed on the historic chart. Note the name Venus Banks immediately above the search area.

The team set out under clear skies but with a freshening breeze to begin the process of surveying the search grid. Alas, however, as tends to happen in affairs of the heart, there were soon problems when the magnetometer failed after the first transect. After some unsuccessful attempts to redeploy the fish, we realised that there was a connection problem and returned to base to switch to the shorter umbilical cable, which is normally used to link the mag with a towed side scan sonar – fortunately this was a very shallow site. Unfortunately, we had lost a lot of time and could not complete the planned search grid that day; we therefore decided that the best option was to run the mag past a target further to the east north east that was reported to us by two separate sources. The estimated position revealed an almost immediate positive return with the mag, but little was visible on the side scan. This site definitely needs to be investigated further, but to date we have been unable to return to the area as repairs to the mag and vessel availability have caused delays. Love remains elusive but we hope to resume our quest in the autumn of 2015 when the conditions are expected to be more favourable.

Image

Moreton Bay Magnetometer Survey – Making it Work

By Paddy Waterson

It’s always exciting, and a bit nerve racking, when you get a new piece of ‘kit’.  Will it be easy to put together? Will it work as well as you hoped?  Will it enable you to achieve the results you have promised?  You have probably seen the same piece of equipment at work and know the basics, but the onus is on you now and there are always tricks to be learnt.

In 2013, the Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage Protection invested in a new Geometrics G882 Marine Magnetometer to assist with the Queensland Historic Shipwreck Survey (QHSS). The QHSS is a five year initiative to update official records on the state’s estimated 1400 historic shipwrecks. The size of the state, and the number of historic shipwrecks, means that the fieldwork component of the survey is aimed at locating, identifying and documenting wrecks in key strategic areas, such as Moreton Bay. The initial phases of fieldwork in the QHSS used an existing side scan sonar system and had been quite successful in locating a number of wrecks. However, it soon became apparent that we need something more. The dynamic nature of the Queensland coast made locating many timber wrecks problematic, largely because they are constructed from materials that are extremely vulnerable to deterioration in the marine environment and so tend to have a lower physical profile. This is compounded by Queensland’s offshore environment that is a mixture of dense corals, thick muds and highly mobile sand, all of which can significantly inhibit the effectiveness of visual and side scan sonar searches for low profile historic shipwrecks. A business case for a magnetometer was subsequently developed and the G882 was purchased using funds from the Commonwealth Historic Shipwrecks Program—now I just have to make it work!

A project was developed to configure and test the magnetometer in local conditions to ensure we achieved the best potential outcomes when it was deployed across the state. This project has two phases:

  1. The initial testing of the magnetometer on five known shipwrecks to determine its operational limits and develop a signature profile guide for different wreck types.
  2. Conducting preliminary research into two previously un-located wrecks in the Moreton Bay Region.

The initial testing phase will use five known wrecks within the greater Moreton region. These wrecks were chosen for their comparative signature profile testing, as they are a good representative sample of the different wreck types commonly encountered along the Queensland coast. The test wrecks range in type from a small wooden schooner and a large iron hulled barque, through to steel hulled trawler. By comparing the different magnetic signatures of the wrecks, and their relative detection ranges, we will be able to refine future survey methods and better interpret results when searching for previously un-located historic shipwrecks.

Table 1. Details of the five wrecks used to test the magnetometer, build a signature profile and refine search methods. These wrecks were chosen due to their variation in size, physical profile and construction materials.

Table 1. Details of the five wrecks used to test the magnetometer, build a signature profile and refine search methods. These wrecks were chosen due to their variation in size, physical profile and construction materials.

The initial configuration and preliminary tests were conducted in November 2013. The hardware configuration for the magnetometer was relatively simple, as it came correctly calibrated for the region. Some minor assembly was required, but this was quickly achieved with the support of staff from Marine Sciences and the Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service.

The Geometrics G882 Marine Magnetometer

The Geometrics G882 Marine Magnetometer

The magnetometer being deployed from the Queensland Marine Parks vessel Caretta.  Assisting are Ranger Rohan Couch (left) and Technical Officer James Fels (right).

The magnetometer being deployed from the Queensland Marine Parks vessel Caretta.  Assisting are Ranger Rohan Couch (left) and Technical Officer James Fels (right).

The initial software configuration proved more challenging, as the magnetometer software was configured to integrate the GPS data via a ‘pin-port’ rather than the more common USB connection—this was resolved through the acquisition of an additional ‘pin-port’ aerial output cable.  The use of a specialised laptop that could cope with the movement of the vessel was also essential—many laptops simply lock up the hard drive when vibration is detected.

The laptop, data junction box and GPS configured and ready for deployment.

The laptop, data junction box and GPS configured and ready for deployment.

With the initial set-up and preliminary systems testing complete the surveys of the known wrecks could commence—and a new range of challenges could begin. More on that in my next blog.